<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why, Rubinho, why???</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.formulaonesport.com/why-rubinho-why/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.formulaonesport.com/why-rubinho-why</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 15:43:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://www.formulaonesport.com/why-rubinho-why/comment-page-1#comment-199</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 11:40:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.formulaonesport.com/why-rubinho-why#comment-199</guid>
		<description>
  &lt;p&gt;One other aspect of this Barrichello-Ferrari deal that must make him smile &lt;br /&gt; at night. Remember, if Williams had paid Stewart the buy out fee required &lt;br /&gt; last year then Rubens could be locked into a deal with Frank now, making him &lt;br /&gt; unavailable for Ferrari....Lucky Boy ! &lt;br /&gt; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Rob &lt;br /&gt;
  
  &lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One other aspect of this Barrichello-Ferrari deal that must make him smile <br /> at night. Remember, if Williams had paid Stewart the buy out fee required <br /> last year then Rubens could be locked into a deal with Frank now, making him <br /> unavailable for Ferrari&#8230;.Lucky Boy !  </p>
<p>Rob </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://www.formulaonesport.com/why-rubinho-why/comment-page-1#comment-198</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 11:40:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.formulaonesport.com/why-rubinho-why#comment-198</guid>
		<description>
  &lt;p&gt;Richard G Clegg &lt;r...@york.ac.uk&gt; wrote in message news:7r1n5f$4l4 &lt;br /&gt; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&gt; (let&#039;s face it, no car has been as consistently good - the Mclaren was &lt;br /&gt; &gt; useless in 96, 97, the Williams useless in 98, 99 - Ferrari has been &lt;br /&gt; &gt; a potential race winner in all those years). &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;The 1996 Ferrari was GOOD?! :-) It certainly was not. &lt;br /&gt; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Tom &lt;br /&gt; -- &lt;br /&gt; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;-- &lt;br /&gt; Tom Cosgrave &#160;{ t...@indigo.ie } &lt;br /&gt; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&quot;Wasted your life in black and white, Kevin Carter&quot; &lt;br /&gt;
  
  &lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Richard G Clegg &lt;r&#8230;@york.ac.uk&gt; wrote in message news:7r1n5f$4l4  </p>
</p>
<p>&gt; (let&#8217;s face it, no car has been as consistently good &#8211; the Mclaren was <br /> &gt; useless in 96, 97, the Williams useless in 98, 99 &#8211; Ferrari has been <br /> &gt; a potential race winner in all those years). </p>
<p>The 1996 Ferrari was GOOD?! <img src='http://www.formulaonesport.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' />  It certainly was not.  </p>
<p>Tom <br /> &#8212;  </p>
<p>&#8211; <br /> Tom Cosgrave &nbsp;{ <a href="mailto:t...@indigo.ie">t&#8230;@indigo.ie</a> }  </p>
<p>&quot;Wasted your life in black and white, Kevin Carter&quot; </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://www.formulaonesport.com/why-rubinho-why/comment-page-1#comment-197</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 11:40:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.formulaonesport.com/why-rubinho-why#comment-197</guid>
		<description>
  Kim Andrews &lt;k...@foca.co.uk&gt; wrote: &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;: On Mon, 6 Sep 1999 18:10:12 CST, Luciano &lt;br /&gt; :&gt;Then when MS retires &#160;(inevitable really) &#160;in approximately 3 years, &lt;br /&gt; :&gt;Barri will be in the perfect position to take over as no.1 and do the &lt;br /&gt; :&gt;honours for Marranello.... &lt;br /&gt; : By which time Rubens will be 30/31 years old... leaving it rather late &lt;br /&gt; : I&#039;d have said. &lt;br /&gt; &lt;p&gt;&#160; Gives him another 4-6 years of driving. &#160;I think many of the recent &lt;br /&gt; WCs have been over 30. &#160;Hill, Prost and Mansell. &#160;Not sure about &lt;br /&gt; Hakkinnen and Senna. &#160;It would not surprise me if historically the &lt;br /&gt; MAJORITy of world champions had been over 30 at the time of their win. &lt;br /&gt; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;:&gt;....wishful thinking perhaps, but I believe it could happen if Barri is &lt;br /&gt; :&gt;good enough. &lt;br /&gt; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;: It&#039;s a nice idea but, I&#039;m not holding my breath. &lt;br /&gt; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&#160; Well, being no 2 at Maranello has not done Irvines bank balance or &lt;br /&gt; career any harm. &#160;He&#039;s had several race wins, four years in a great car &lt;br /&gt; (let&#039;s face it, no car has been as consistently good - the Mclaren was &lt;br /&gt; useless in 96, 97, the Williams useless in 98, 99 - Ferrari has been &lt;br /&gt; a potential race winner in all those years). &lt;br /&gt; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&#160; Remember also that Barichello has spent his career waiting for teams &lt;br /&gt; to come good. &#160;Almost certainly the 2000 Ferrari will be a better car &lt;br /&gt; than the 2000 Stewart. &lt;br /&gt; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&#160; If, as Barichello claims (in Brazillian newspapers) he will NOT be &lt;br /&gt; contracted as no 2 he has made a great deal. &#160;If he has contracted as no &lt;br /&gt; 2 he will be learning from the best driver with much more testing than &lt;br /&gt; Stewart has previously been able to offer him and the possibility to be &lt;br /&gt; no 1 when Schumi retires. &lt;br /&gt; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&#160; The risk, of course, is that Rubinho is a classic understeer driver &lt;br /&gt; and a Schumi developed car may not suit his style much. &#160;A good driver &lt;br /&gt; can get round this. &#160;[As Berger said of Senna &quot;Really, he had no &lt;br /&gt; particular driving style, he drove each car in the fastest way to drive &lt;br /&gt; that car.&quot;] &lt;br /&gt; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;-- &lt;br /&gt; Richard G. Clegg &#160; &#160; Only the mind is waving &lt;br /&gt; Dept. of Mathematics (Network Control group) Uni. of York. &lt;br /&gt; email: rich...@manor.york.ac.uk &#160; &lt;br /&gt; www: http://manor.york.ac.uk/top.html &lt;br /&gt;
  
  &lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kim Andrews &lt;k&#8230;@foca.co.uk&gt; wrote: </p>
<p>: On Mon, 6 Sep 1999 18:10:12 CST, Luciano <br /> :&gt;Then when MS retires &nbsp;(inevitable really) &nbsp;in approximately 3 years, <br /> :&gt;Barri will be in the perfect position to take over as no.1 and do the <br /> :&gt;honours for Marranello&#8230;. <br /> : By which time Rubens will be 30/31 years old&#8230; leaving it rather late <br /> : I&#8217;d have said. <br /> 
<p>&nbsp; Gives him another 4-6 years of driving. &nbsp;I think many of the recent <br /> WCs have been over 30. &nbsp;Hill, Prost and Mansell. &nbsp;Not sure about <br /> Hakkinnen and Senna. &nbsp;It would not surprise me if historically the <br /> MAJORITy of world champions had been over 30 at the time of their win.  </p>
<p>:&gt;&#8230;.wishful thinking perhaps, but I believe it could happen if Barri is <br /> :&gt;good enough.  </p>
<p>: It&#8217;s a nice idea but, I&#8217;m not holding my breath.  </p>
<p>&nbsp; Well, being no 2 at Maranello has not done Irvines bank balance or <br /> career any harm. &nbsp;He&#8217;s had several race wins, four years in a great car <br /> (let&#8217;s face it, no car has been as consistently good &#8211; the Mclaren was <br /> useless in 96, 97, the Williams useless in 98, 99 &#8211; Ferrari has been <br /> a potential race winner in all those years).  </p>
<p>&nbsp; Remember also that Barichello has spent his career waiting for teams <br /> to come good. &nbsp;Almost certainly the 2000 Ferrari will be a better car <br /> than the 2000 Stewart.  </p>
<p>&nbsp; If, as Barichello claims (in Brazillian newspapers) he will NOT be <br /> contracted as no 2 he has made a great deal. &nbsp;If he has contracted as no <br /> 2 he will be learning from the best driver with much more testing than <br /> Stewart has previously been able to offer him and the possibility to be <br /> no 1 when Schumi retires.  </p>
<p>&nbsp; The risk, of course, is that Rubinho is a classic understeer driver <br /> and a Schumi developed car may not suit his style much. &nbsp;A good driver <br /> can get round this. &nbsp;[As Berger said of Senna &quot;Really, he had no <br /> particular driving style, he drove each car in the fastest way to drive <br /> that car.&quot;]  </p>
<p>&#8211; <br /> Richard G. Clegg &nbsp; &nbsp; Only the mind is waving <br /> Dept. of Mathematics (Network Control group) Uni. of York. <br /> email: <a href="mailto:rich...@manor.york.ac.uk">rich&#8230;@manor.york.ac.uk</a> &nbsp; <br /> www: <a href="http://manor.york.ac.uk/top.html" rel="nofollow">http://manor.york.ac.uk/top.html</a> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://www.formulaonesport.com/why-rubinho-why/comment-page-1#comment-196</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 11:40:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.formulaonesport.com/why-rubinho-why#comment-196</guid>
		<description>
  On Mon, 6 Sep 1999 18:10:11 CST, Luciano said ... &lt;br /&gt; &lt;p&gt;&gt; Arrogant, dangerous.... &#160;...call him what you will, but MS is pure &lt;br /&gt; &gt; fast and no one will be able to beat him in a Ferrari. &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;Unfortunately, that&#039;s something we&#039;ll never know, unless the second &lt;br /&gt; driver is allowed to race against Schumacher. &#160;You can&#039;t argue that &lt;br /&gt; no-one can beat Schumacher in a Ferrari when no-one has ever been &lt;br /&gt; allowed to try &#160;;-) &lt;br /&gt; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&gt; But I do agree with you that Ferrari would be more appealing if &lt;br /&gt; &gt; they offered equal status, at least then drivers would be given &lt;br /&gt; &gt; the chance to challenge MS. &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;Any driver who goes to Ferrari as number two to Michael Schumacher is &lt;br /&gt; agreeing that he will not have a shot at the drivers&#039; title while they &lt;br /&gt; are both there. &#160;That may be okay for someone who is willing to serve &lt;br /&gt; an apprenticeship as a junior driver, but not for one who is ready to &lt;br /&gt; take his own shot at the title, as I think Barrichello could be. &lt;br /&gt; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Cheers, &lt;br /&gt; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Julie &lt;br /&gt; -- &lt;br /&gt; Julie Miles &lt;br /&gt; Regina, Saskatchewan, Canada &lt;br /&gt; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Never ascribe to malice &lt;br /&gt; that which can be adequately explained by stupidity &lt;br /&gt;
  
  &lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On Mon, 6 Sep 1999 18:10:11 CST, Luciano said &#8230; <br /> 
<p>&gt; Arrogant, dangerous&#8230;. &nbsp;&#8230;call him what you will, but MS is pure <br /> &gt; fast and no one will be able to beat him in a Ferrari. </p>
<p>Unfortunately, that&#8217;s something we&#8217;ll never know, unless the second <br /> driver is allowed to race against Schumacher. &nbsp;You can&#8217;t argue that <br /> no-one can beat Schumacher in a Ferrari when no-one has ever been <br /> allowed to try &nbsp;;-)  </p>
<p>&gt; But I do agree with you that Ferrari would be more appealing if <br /> &gt; they offered equal status, at least then drivers would be given <br /> &gt; the chance to challenge MS. </p>
<p>Any driver who goes to Ferrari as number two to Michael Schumacher is <br /> agreeing that he will not have a shot at the drivers&#8217; title while they <br /> are both there. &nbsp;That may be okay for someone who is willing to serve <br /> an apprenticeship as a junior driver, but not for one who is ready to <br /> take his own shot at the title, as I think Barrichello could be.  </p>
<p>Cheers,  </p>
<p>Julie <br /> &#8212; <br /> Julie Miles <br /> Regina, Saskatchewan, Canada  </p>
<p>Never ascribe to malice <br /> that which can be adequately explained by stupidity </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://www.formulaonesport.com/why-rubinho-why/comment-page-1#comment-195</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 11:40:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.formulaonesport.com/why-rubinho-why#comment-195</guid>
		<description>
  &lt;p&gt;Julie Miles &lt;ju...@rasf1m.org&gt; wrote: &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;: Driving for Ferrari *used* to be a dream come true, but I don&#039;t think &lt;br /&gt; : it has quite the same attraction today. &#160;They still have the history &lt;br /&gt; : and the prestige, but they also have a driver who seems able to make &lt;br /&gt; : his own terms and conditions, to the detriment of the team&#039;s other &lt;br /&gt; : driver. &#160; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&#160; I don&#039;t think conditions at Ferrari have been this good for a long &lt;br /&gt; time. &#160;The political side has settled down and they&#039;re less given to &lt;br /&gt; random behaviour - remember it&#039;s not THAT long since they were sacking &lt;br /&gt; Prost for not being good enough. &lt;br /&gt; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&#160; I hope that Rubens doesn&#039;t turn into one of those drivers who whine &lt;br /&gt; about unfair treatment re:Schumi. &#160;If Ferrari believed for one second &lt;br /&gt; that given equal treatment the second driver would be faster then the &lt;br /&gt; second driver would be the first driver. &lt;br /&gt; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;: Unless Barrichello has been able to negotiate more favourable &lt;br /&gt; : terms than Irvine operated under, I think this is a bad move for him. &lt;br /&gt; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&#160; The ferrari will be a faster car than the Stewart for a couple of &lt;br /&gt; years even if all goes incredibly well at Stewart. &#160;It takes time to &lt;br /&gt; upscale a team like that and the ford &quot;Drop a suitcase of money and &lt;br /&gt; hope&quot; approach hasn&#039;t worked as quickly as they hoped in Touring Cars or &lt;br /&gt; in Rallying (well, it&#039;s worked a bit in Rallying). &#160;If he hasn&#039;t burned &lt;br /&gt; bridges at Stewart then Rubens can go back since JAckie is very keen on &lt;br /&gt; him as a driver. &lt;br /&gt; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&#160; As a Barichello fan I&#039;m pleased - we&#039;ll finally find out how good he &lt;br /&gt; really _is_. &lt;br /&gt; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&#160; As a Stewart fan, naturally I&#039;m less happy - I think they&#039;re trading &lt;br /&gt; down by getting Irvine and keeping Herbert on is looking like a mistake &lt;br /&gt; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Richard G. Clegg &#160; &#160; Only the mind is waving &lt;br /&gt; Dept. of Mathematics (Network Control group) Uni. of York. &lt;br /&gt; email: rich...@manor.york.ac.uk &#160; &lt;br /&gt; www: http://manor.york.ac.uk/top.html &lt;br /&gt;
  
  &lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Julie Miles &lt;ju&#8230;@rasf1m.org&gt; wrote: </p>
<p>: Driving for Ferrari *used* to be a dream come true, but I don&#8217;t think <br /> : it has quite the same attraction today. &nbsp;They still have the history <br /> : and the prestige, but they also have a driver who seems able to make <br /> : his own terms and conditions, to the detriment of the team&#8217;s other <br /> : driver. &nbsp;  </p>
<p>&nbsp; I don&#8217;t think conditions at Ferrari have been this good for a long <br /> time. &nbsp;The political side has settled down and they&#8217;re less given to <br /> random behaviour &#8211; remember it&#8217;s not THAT long since they were sacking <br /> Prost for not being good enough.  </p>
<p>&nbsp; I hope that Rubens doesn&#8217;t turn into one of those drivers who whine <br /> about unfair treatment re:Schumi. &nbsp;If Ferrari believed for one second <br /> that given equal treatment the second driver would be faster then the <br /> second driver would be the first driver.  </p>
<p>: Unless Barrichello has been able to negotiate more favourable <br /> : terms than Irvine operated under, I think this is a bad move for him.  </p>
<p>&nbsp; The ferrari will be a faster car than the Stewart for a couple of <br /> years even if all goes incredibly well at Stewart. &nbsp;It takes time to <br /> upscale a team like that and the ford &quot;Drop a suitcase of money and <br /> hope&quot; approach hasn&#8217;t worked as quickly as they hoped in Touring Cars or <br /> in Rallying (well, it&#8217;s worked a bit in Rallying). &nbsp;If he hasn&#8217;t burned <br /> bridges at Stewart then Rubens can go back since JAckie is very keen on <br /> him as a driver.  </p>
<p>&nbsp; As a Barichello fan I&#8217;m pleased &#8211; we&#8217;ll finally find out how good he <br /> really _is_.  </p>
<p>&nbsp; As a Stewart fan, naturally I&#8217;m less happy &#8211; I think they&#8217;re trading <br /> down by getting Irvine and keeping Herbert on is looking like a mistake  </p>
<p>Richard G. Clegg &nbsp; &nbsp; Only the mind is waving <br /> Dept. of Mathematics (Network Control group) Uni. of York. <br /> email: <a href="mailto:rich...@manor.york.ac.uk">rich&#8230;@manor.york.ac.uk</a> &nbsp; <br /> www: <a href="http://manor.york.ac.uk/top.html" rel="nofollow">http://manor.york.ac.uk/top.html</a> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://www.formulaonesport.com/why-rubinho-why/comment-page-1#comment-194</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 11:39:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.formulaonesport.com/why-rubinho-why#comment-194</guid>
		<description>
  One area that Barrichello might come unstuck is that his driving style is &lt;br /&gt; very different from MS. Irvine liked a similar car to MS - pointy, tending &lt;br /&gt; to oversteer - which meant that he could still effectively use a car &lt;br /&gt; developed for MS. &lt;br /&gt; &lt;p&gt;Barrichello might find the Schumacher Ferrari not to his liking, as he &lt;br /&gt; prefers an understeery car. He might suffer as a result. &lt;br /&gt;
  
  &lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One area that Barrichello might come unstuck is that his driving style is <br /> very different from MS. Irvine liked a similar car to MS &#8211; pointy, tending <br /> to oversteer &#8211; which meant that he could still effectively use a car <br /> developed for MS. <br /> 
<p>Barrichello might find the Schumacher Ferrari not to his liking, as he <br /> prefers an understeery car. He might suffer as a result. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://www.formulaonesport.com/why-rubinho-why/comment-page-1#comment-193</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 11:39:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.formulaonesport.com/why-rubinho-why#comment-193</guid>
		<description>
  &lt;p&gt;Rob &lt;r...@f1-net.demon.co.uk&gt; wrote: &lt;br /&gt; &gt; Lets not forget the materialistic answer to the question that this thread &lt;br /&gt; &gt; asks. As reported in the Daily Telegraph, £6 million a year is better than &lt;br /&gt; &gt; £3 million at Stewart. &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;According to the Portuguese Autosport, Barrichello will be paid &lt;br /&gt; 4.5 million US dollars, so about half that Daily Telegraph figure. &lt;br /&gt; Auto-Hebdo said $5 million plus bonus for points up to a maximum &lt;br /&gt; of $2 million, so $7 million maximum, which is still less than £6 &lt;br /&gt; million. &lt;br /&gt; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Irvine is getting a better deal from Ford, but I don&#039;t have here &lt;br /&gt; the number ($10 million ?), but I doubt Ford was willing to pay &lt;br /&gt; the same kind of money for Barrichello. &lt;br /&gt; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;BTW, playing Devil&#039;s advocate, Barrichello reasons might be: &lt;br /&gt; - even the #2 Ferrari will usually better placed than the #1 Jaguar. &lt;br /&gt; - his contract is not as bad as Irvine&#039;s. &lt;br /&gt; - with Irvine in the Jaguar team being paid a lot more than him, &lt;br /&gt; &#160; Barrichello would be a &quot;de facto&quot; #2, so his choice was really &lt;br /&gt; &#160; between being #2 at Ferrari or #2 at Jaguar. &lt;br /&gt; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;-- &lt;br /&gt; http://www.mat.uc.pt/~rps/f1/ &#160;a born-again-tifoso &lt;br /&gt; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; Mark Sandman - Morphine, RIP (July 3th, 1999, Italy) &lt;br /&gt; .pt is Portugal&#124; `Whom the gods love die young&#039;-Menander (342-292 BC) &lt;br /&gt; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; Europe &#124; &#160; &#160;Villeneuve 50-82, Toivonen 56-86, Senna 60-94 &lt;br /&gt;
  
  &lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rob &lt;r&#8230;@f1-net.demon.co.uk&gt; wrote: <br /> &gt; Lets not forget the materialistic answer to the question that this thread <br /> &gt; asks. As reported in the Daily Telegraph, £6 million a year is better than <br /> &gt; £3 million at Stewart. </p>
<p>According to the Portuguese Autosport, Barrichello will be paid <br /> 4.5 million US dollars, so about half that Daily Telegraph figure. <br /> Auto-Hebdo said $5 million plus bonus for points up to a maximum <br /> of $2 million, so $7 million maximum, which is still less than £6 <br /> million.  </p>
<p>Irvine is getting a better deal from Ford, but I don&#8217;t have here <br /> the number ($10 million ?), but I doubt Ford was willing to pay <br /> the same kind of money for Barrichello.  </p>
<p>BTW, playing Devil&#8217;s advocate, Barrichello reasons might be: <br /> &#8211; even the #2 Ferrari will usually better placed than the #1 Jaguar. <br /> &#8211; his contract is not as bad as Irvine&#8217;s. <br /> &#8211; with Irvine in the Jaguar team being paid a lot more than him, <br /> &nbsp; Barrichello would be a &quot;de facto&quot; #2, so his choice was really <br /> &nbsp; between being #2 at Ferrari or #2 at Jaguar.  </p>
<p>&#8211; <br /> <a href="http://www.mat.uc.pt/~rps/f1/" rel="nofollow">http://www.mat.uc.pt/~rps/f1/</a> &nbsp;a born-again-tifoso <br /> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; Mark Sandman &#8211; Morphine, RIP (July 3th, 1999, Italy) <br /> .pt is Portugal| `Whom the gods love die young&#8217;-Menander (342-292 BC) <br /> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; Europe | &nbsp; &nbsp;Villeneuve 50-82, Toivonen 56-86, Senna 60-94 </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://www.formulaonesport.com/why-rubinho-why/comment-page-1#comment-192</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 11:39:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.formulaonesport.com/why-rubinho-why#comment-192</guid>
		<description>
  On Mon, 6 Sep 1999 19:38:46 CST, Tony Scholes &lt;to...@beacon.co.uk&gt; &lt;br /&gt; wrote: &lt;br /&gt; &lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&gt;Kim Andrews wrote: &lt;br /&gt; &gt;&gt; By which time Rubens will be 30/31 years old... leaving it rather late &lt;br /&gt; &gt;&gt; I&#039;d have said. &lt;br /&gt; &gt;Rubens has time on his hands I would say, he&#039;s one of the youngest in &lt;br /&gt; &gt;the top teams by a few years, and if his career lasts as long as many &lt;br /&gt; &gt;(shall we say till he is 35, which BTW is a very good age indeed and one &lt;br /&gt; &gt;at which many men only just start to be able to acheive their potential &lt;br /&gt; &gt;:^)) then he has 7/8 years left... &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;The game gets younger all the time, the current crop of players don&#039;t. &lt;br /&gt; My feeling is that into the thirties will increasingly become &quot;past &lt;br /&gt; it&quot; in this (and many other) sporting fields. &#160;I look forward to being &lt;br /&gt; proved wrong. :o) &lt;br /&gt; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Kimbo &lt;br /&gt; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;-- &lt;br /&gt; Belgian issue out now &lt;br /&gt; Formula One Cartoon Archive &lt;br /&gt; http://www.foca.co.uk &lt;br /&gt; k...@foca.co.uk &lt;br /&gt;
  
  &lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On Mon, 6 Sep 1999 19:38:46 CST, Tony Scholes &lt;to&#8230;@beacon.co.uk&gt; <br /> wrote: <br /> 
</p>
<p>&gt;Kim Andrews wrote: <br /> &gt;&gt; By which time Rubens will be 30/31 years old&#8230; leaving it rather late <br /> &gt;&gt; I&#8217;d have said. <br /> &gt;Rubens has time on his hands I would say, he&#8217;s one of the youngest in <br /> &gt;the top teams by a few years, and if his career lasts as long as many <br /> &gt;(shall we say till he is 35, which BTW is a very good age indeed and one <br /> &gt;at which many men only just start to be able to acheive their potential <br /> &gt;:^)) then he has 7/8 years left&#8230; </p>
<p>The game gets younger all the time, the current crop of players don&#8217;t. <br /> My feeling is that into the thirties will increasingly become &quot;past <br /> it&quot; in this (and many other) sporting fields. &nbsp;I look forward to being <br /> proved wrong. <img src='http://www.formulaonesport.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_surprised.gif' alt=':o' class='wp-smiley' /> )  </p>
<p>Kimbo  </p>
<p>&#8211; <br /> Belgian issue out now <br /> Formula One Cartoon Archive <br /> <a href="http://www.foca.co.uk" rel="nofollow">http://www.foca.co.uk</a> <br /> <a href="mailto:k...@foca.co.uk">k&#8230;@foca.co.uk</a> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://www.formulaonesport.com/why-rubinho-why/comment-page-1#comment-191</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 11:39:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.formulaonesport.com/why-rubinho-why#comment-191</guid>
		<description>
  &lt;p&gt;Lets not forget the materialistic answer to the question that this thread &lt;br /&gt; asks. As reported in the Daily Telegraph, £6 million a year is better than &lt;br /&gt; £3 million at Stewart. Add to that the mega marketing dosh from being at the &lt;br /&gt; Scuderia which should double his income (quadruple it if he should become &lt;br /&gt; the World Champion) and you have to say its an offer not to be refused. Add &lt;br /&gt; to that the &#039;glamour and fame&#039; aspect which may or may not appeal to Rubens, &lt;br /&gt; driving a Ferrari is every red blooded boys dream (well that and Liz Hurley &lt;br /&gt; jelly wrestling with Gerri Halliwell !). &#160;Also this age thing is not an &lt;br /&gt; issue for Rubens, if he does well at Ferrari then he will still be in his &lt;br /&gt; early thirties when Schu retires, Senna was still brilliant at that age and &lt;br /&gt; even Damon Hill managed a World Championship at what, 35?. At this stage, &lt;br /&gt; with his amazing depth of experience and natural skill he just could become &lt;br /&gt; one of the best drivers ever. &lt;br /&gt; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;rob &lt;br /&gt;
  
  &lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lets not forget the materialistic answer to the question that this thread <br /> asks. As reported in the Daily Telegraph, £6 million a year is better than <br /> £3 million at Stewart. Add to that the mega marketing dosh from being at the <br /> Scuderia which should double his income (quadruple it if he should become <br /> the World Champion) and you have to say its an offer not to be refused. Add <br /> to that the &#8216;glamour and fame&#8217; aspect which may or may not appeal to Rubens, <br /> driving a Ferrari is every red blooded boys dream (well that and Liz Hurley <br /> jelly wrestling with Gerri Halliwell !). &nbsp;Also this age thing is not an <br /> issue for Rubens, if he does well at Ferrari then he will still be in his <br /> early thirties when Schu retires, Senna was still brilliant at that age and <br /> even Damon Hill managed a World Championship at what, 35?. At this stage, <br /> with his amazing depth of experience and natural skill he just could become <br /> one of the best drivers ever.  </p>
<p>rob </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://www.formulaonesport.com/why-rubinho-why/comment-page-1#comment-190</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 11:39:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.formulaonesport.com/why-rubinho-why#comment-190</guid>
		<description>
  &lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Kim Andrews wrote: &lt;br /&gt; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&gt; On Mon, 6 Sep 1999 18:10:12 CST, Luciano &lt;br /&gt; &gt; &lt;Luci...@melito.freeserve.co.uk&gt; wrote: &lt;br /&gt; [snip] &lt;br /&gt; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&gt; &gt;Then when MS retires &#160;(inevitable really) &#160;in approximately 3 years, &lt;br /&gt; &gt; &gt;Barri will be in the perfect position to take over as no.1 and do the &lt;br /&gt; &gt; &gt;honours for Marranello.... &lt;br /&gt; &gt; By which time Rubens will be 30/31 years old... leaving it rather late &lt;br /&gt; &gt; I&#039;d have said. &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;? &lt;br /&gt; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Rubens has time on his hands I would say, he&#039;s one of the youngest in &lt;br /&gt; the top teams by a few years, and if his career lasts as long as many &lt;br /&gt; (shall we say till he is 35, which BTW is a very good age indeed and one &lt;br /&gt; at which many men only just start to be able to acheive their potential &lt;br /&gt; :^)) then he has 7/8 years left... &lt;br /&gt; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;There has been a lot of chatter regarding Rubens mental &quot;weaknesses&quot;, I &lt;br /&gt; think many forget that &lt;br /&gt; he is still relatively young, and was only 22 when Senna was killed... &lt;br /&gt; People mature and develop mental strength as &lt;br /&gt; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I reckon this could be a good move for RB, Michaels star is on the wane &lt;br /&gt; methinks, and if Rubens gets on his pace quickly (not impossible looking &lt;br /&gt; at his recent performanances, then tings will be very interesting indeed &lt;br /&gt; chez Ferrari... &lt;br /&gt; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;[snip] &lt;br /&gt; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;- Hide quoted text -- Show quoted text -&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&gt; Kimbo &lt;br /&gt; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&gt; -- &lt;br /&gt; &gt; Belgian issue out now &lt;br /&gt; &gt; Formula One Cartoon Archive &lt;br /&gt; &gt; http://www.foca.co.uk &lt;br /&gt; &gt; k...@foca.co.uk &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;
  
  &lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[</p>
<p>Kim Andrews wrote:  </p>
<p>&gt; On Mon, 6 Sep 1999 18:10:12 CST, Luciano <br /> &gt; &lt;Luci&#8230;@melito.freeserve.co.uk&gt; wrote: <br /> [snip]  </p>
<p>&gt; &gt;Then when MS retires &nbsp;(inevitable really) &nbsp;in approximately 3 years, <br /> &gt; &gt;Barri will be in the perfect position to take over as no.1 and do the <br /> &gt; &gt;honours for Marranello&#8230;. <br /> &gt; By which time Rubens will be 30/31 years old&#8230; leaving it rather late <br /> &gt; I&#8217;d have said. </p>
<p>?  </p>
<p>Rubens has time on his hands I would say, he&#8217;s one of the youngest in <br /> the top teams by a few years, and if his career lasts as long as many <br /> (shall we say till he is 35, which BTW is a very good age indeed and one <br /> at which many men only just start to be able to acheive their potential <br /> :^)) then he has 7/8 years left&#8230;  </p>
<p>There has been a lot of chatter regarding Rubens mental &quot;weaknesses&quot;, I <br /> think many forget that <br /> he is still relatively young, and was only 22 when Senna was killed&#8230; <br /> People mature and develop mental strength as  </p>
<p>I reckon this could be a good move for RB, Michaels star is on the wane <br /> methinks, and if Rubens gets on his pace quickly (not impossible looking <br /> at his recent performanances, then tings will be very interesting indeed <br /> chez Ferrari&#8230;  </p>
<p>[snip]  </p>
<p>- Hide quoted text &#8212; Show quoted text -</p>
<p>&gt; Kimbo  </p>
<p>&gt; &#8212; <br /> &gt; Belgian issue out now <br /> &gt; Formula One Cartoon Archive <br /> &gt; <a href="http://www.foca.co.uk" rel="nofollow">http://www.foca.co.uk</a> <br /> &gt; <a href="mailto:k...@foca.co.uk">k&#8230;@foca.co.uk</a> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

